Free template · 2026

Scrum Master Job Description Template

A ready-to-use Scrum Master job description for 2026, with the interview scorecard and questions to hire one. Copy it as is or customize it free in about 15 seconds.

Includes the job description, an interview scorecard and questions for every round.

Mid-level in Latin America
$4,500/mo
Same role in the US
$11,875/mo
You save
Up to 62%

All-in monthly cost, 2026 rates.

Job description template
Copy text

Scrum Master

You will facilitate Scrum and help the team deliver high-quality software predictably. You coach agile practices, remove impediments, and improve how the team plans, executes, and reviews work while partnering with stakeholders to maintain alignment and transparency.

Responsibilities

  • Facilitate Scrum ceremonies (e.g., Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, Retrospective) and ensure consistent, time-boxed execution
  • Coach the team on agile practices, including refining a shared definition of done, backlog health, and clear sprint goals
  • Identify impediments and drive resolution by coordinating with engineering, product, and stakeholders
  • Improve delivery predictability by supporting estimation practices and clarifying scope, risks, and dependencies
  • Track and communicate progress using agreed agile metrics and sprint artifacts (backlog, sprint board, burndown/burnup where applicable)
  • Support continuous improvement initiatives based on retrospective outcomes and measurable process changes
  • Promote effective collaboration across roles to ensure stakeholder transparency and actionable feedback loops

Must-have qualifications

  • Hands-on experience facilitating Scrum ceremonies in a software delivery environment
  • Ability to coach teams on agile fundamentals (backlog refinement, sprint goals, definition of done, retrospectives)
  • Track record of improving delivery predictability through measurable process changes
  • Experience removing impediments and coordinating cross-functionally to resolve delivery blockers
  • Working knowledge of Agile metrics and artifacts (e.g., backlog, sprint goals, sprint review outcomes)
  • Clear, professional communication with product and engineering stakeholders

Nice to have

  • Experience scaling Scrum practices across multiple teams or shared services
  • Familiarity with remote team coordination and distributed-work agile routines
  • Experience with Jira or similar tools to manage Scrum workflows
  • Knowledge of SAFe or other agile frameworks (at a practical, coaching level)

What success looks like in 12 months

  • Scrum cadence is consistent and effective
  • Backlog and sprint goal quality improves
  • Delivery predictability improves
  • Impediments are resolved faster and with better visibility
  • Continuous improvement is institutionalized

Logistics

  • Full-time (40 hours a week), remote from Latin America.
  • Working hours overlap with US business hours.

About the company

[About your company: what you build, your stage and team size]

Want it tailored to your stack, seniority and time zone?

Customize with the free generator →
Interview scorecard

Score every candidate against the same bar

Enable a high-performing Scrum team to deliver predictable outcomes through facilitation, coaching, and relentless removal of impediments.

Outcomes to measure

What this hire should deliver in the first year. Replace [N] with your own targets.

  • Scrum cadence is consistent and effective. Measure: Achieve [X]% on-time completion of planned Scrum events (e.g., Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum cadence, Sprint Review, Retrospective) over [Y] sprints
  • Backlog and sprint goal quality improves. Measure: Increase backlog health score/quality metric by [X]% and improve sprint goal clarity so that [X]% of sprints meet the sprint goal as defined by the team
  • Delivery predictability improves. Measure: Reduce sprint scope churn by [X]% and increase reliable delivery (planned vs. completed work) to [X]% over [Y] sprints
  • Impediments are resolved faster and with better visibility. Measure: Improve average time-to-resolve top delivery impediments from [baseline] to [target] days and close [X]% of impediment tickets within the agreed SLA
  • Continuous improvement is institutionalized. Measure: Deliver [N] measurable process improvements from retrospectives (e.g., definition of done changes, workflow adjustments) and achieve [X]% adoption/usage in the following sprint

Competencies and weights

What to evaluate, how much it counts and what a strong answer looks like.

Scrum Facilitation · 24%
The role is accountable for high-quality Scrum ceremonies and clear sprint execution. Evaluated in Round 1.

  • Weak: Runs meetings with inconsistent time-boxing or unclear outputs; leaves sprint events without actionable decisions or updates.
  • Meets the bar: Facilitates events with clear agendas and outputs (e.g., sprint goal, risks, action items); ensures the team uses sprint artifacts.
  • Strong: Improves ceremony effectiveness through coaching and refinement; consistently produces high-signal outputs (clear decisions, measurable next steps) and aligns stakeholders on sprint expectations.

Agile Coaching · 20%
You will coach the team on agile fundamentals that directly affect planning, quality, and learning. Evaluated in Round 1.

  • Weak: Explains agile concepts but fails to translate them into team behavior changes.
  • Meets the bar: Coaches backlog refinement, retrospectives, and definition of done in ways the team adopts; helps the team maintain clarity on sprint goals.
  • Strong: Tailors coaching to team maturity; drives sustained behavioral change that improves outcomes (e.g., backlog quality, reduced rework, better learning loops).

Impediment Removal · 18%
Removing blockers requires cross-functional influence and structured problem-solving. Evaluated in Round 2.

  • Weak: Escalates blockers late or without clear ownership; impediments remain unresolved for extended periods.
  • Meets the bar: Identifies blockers early, assigns clear ownership, and follows up until resolution; keeps the team and stakeholders informed.
  • Strong: Proactively surfaces systemic impediments, coordinates multiple parties to eliminate root causes, and prevents recurrence through process adjustments.

Delivery Predictability · 18%
Success depends on measurable improvements in planning reliability and scope control. Evaluated in Round 2.

  • Weak: Relies on anecdotes or opinions about progress; cannot connect actions to predictable delivery.
  • Meets the bar: Uses agreed metrics/artifacts to track progress and communicates risks; supports clearer scope definition and planning discipline.
  • Strong: Leads targeted improvements based on evidence (metrics, retrospective insights); drives measurable increases in planned-vs-completed reliability and reduced churn.

Stakeholder Communication · 12%
The Scrum Master must maintain transparency and alignment with product and engineering stakeholders. Evaluated in Round 3.

  • Weak: Communication is unclear or inconsistent; stakeholders receive late updates or conflicting information.
  • Meets the bar: Provides timely, structured updates and ensures stakeholder feedback is captured and drives sprint decisions.
  • Strong: Proactively manages expectations and clarifies tradeoffs; builds trust through consistent, high-quality communication and decision records.

Continuous Improvement · 8%
A core part of the role is turning retrospectives into sustainable change. Evaluated in Round 3.

  • Weak: Retrospectives happen but do not lead to follow-through or measurable process change.
  • Meets the bar: Ensures retrospectives produce actionable improvements and that the team reviews impact in subsequent sprints.
  • Strong: Facilitates a learning culture where improvements are tracked, adopted, and refined; uses data and team feedback to iterate on process changes.
Interview questions

Questions for every interview round

Each round has an owner, a time box and questions that test the competencies above.

Round 1: Scrum facilitation & coaching
Scrum/Agile Lead · 45 min

  1. Tell us about a time you improved the quality of Sprint Planning or Sprint Reviews. What was the problem, what did you change, and how did you measure improvement?
  2. Walk through how you facilitate backlog refinement and definition of done. How do you ensure the team leaves the session with clear, usable outcomes?
  3. Describe a retrospective you facilitated that led to a meaningful change. How did you select the improvement, and how did you confirm it worked?

Round 2: Impediments & predictability
Engineering Manager · 45 min

  1. Describe your approach to removing impediments. How do you identify them early, assign ownership, and track resolution to completion?
  2. Tell us about a time delivery predictability was slipping (e.g., missed sprint goals, high scope churn). What evidence did you use, what actions did you take as Scrum Master, and what changed afterward?
  3. Give an example of how you managed dependencies or risks during a sprint. How did you communicate them and what did you do to keep delivery on track?

Round 3: Stakeholders & continuous improvement
Product Owner · 45 min

  1. How do you communicate sprint status, tradeoffs, and risks to product and engineering stakeholders—especially when plans change?
  2. Describe how you incorporate stakeholder feedback from Sprint Reviews into the backlog and next sprint planning.
  3. Tell us about a continuous improvement you drove that required changing team behavior. What resistance did you encounter and how did you lead the team through the change?

Red flags to watch for

  • Treats Scrum events as optional checklists rather than mechanisms for planning, inspection, and adaptation
  • Cannot explain how agile metrics/artifacts link to delivery predictability and decision-making
  • Consistently escalates issues without driving ownership to resolution or measurable follow-through
  • Communication is reactive or unclear, leading to stakeholder misalignment on scope, priorities, or sprint goals
  • Retrospectives produce actions but there is no evidence of adoption or impact over subsequent sprints

How much does it cost to hire a Scrum Master in Latin America?

In 2026, a senior Scrum Master in Latin America costs $6,750 to $7,750 a month all-in, versus $14,625 in the US: up to 54% less. Mid-level starts at $4,500.

Country

Mid-level

Senior

Argentina

$4,500

$6,750

Brazil

$5,000

$7,500

Colombia

$4,500

$6,750

Mexico

$5,250

$7,750

United States

$11,875

$14,625

Monthly cost in USD, all-in: the talent's salary plus Teilur's flat 20% fee, from our 2026 rates. The United States row shows what the same role typically costs there.

Compare costs in the calculator →

Frequently asked questions

What does a Scrum Master do?

Typical responsibilities include: facilitate Scrum ceremonies (e.g., Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, Retrospective) and ensure consistent, time-boxed execution; coach the team on agile practices, including refining a shared definition of done, backlog health, and clear sprint goals; identify impediments and drive resolution by coordinating with engineering, product, and stakeholders. The full list is in the template above.

How much does it cost to hire a Scrum Master in Latin America?

In 2026, a senior Scrum Master in Latin America costs $6,750 to $7,750 a month all-in, versus $14,625 in the US: up to 54% less. Mid-level starts at $4,500.

Can I customize this Scrum Master job description?

Yes. Teilur's free Job Description & Scorecard Generator rewrites it for your stack, seniority, time zone and hiring urgency in about 15 seconds. No sign-up needed.

More free hiring tools

Keep going with the rest of your hire.

See all free tools →

Need to fill this role?

Teilur shortlists pre-vetted Scrum Masters from Latin America in about 5 days. Flat 20% of what you pay, no subscription.